The key to seeing that the inverse of the DFT is itself a DFT is to see that although it is not computed as a matrix product, the result of the DFT is a matrix product.
As we have seen,
If we look at any specific component
we see
So the complete output is
where
is the Vandermonde matrix
which has
in its
row,
column
Clearly, if we know an output
, we can recover the value of a from the equation
Theorem. If ω is a primitive
root of unity and
is the corresponding Vandermonde matrix, then
Proof: We simply compute the product
and verify that it is equal to
This implies that
=N V[ω]
. The factor V[ω] can be cancelled and then the conclusion of the theorem follows. As for the product:![]()
and if ![]()
Examples.
We saw above that the complex number
is a primitive
root of unity and ![]()
In the field of integers modulo 17, 9 is a primitive 8th root of unity and 2 is its inverse.
![[Graphics:../Images/FFT_gr_109.gif]](../Images/FFT_gr_109.gif)
Back to inverting the DFT. Since inverting the DFT is the same as multiplying by the a Vandermonde matrix, we can conclude that
If
, then