Presentations and Papers: Instructions and Expectations
You must choose the same topic for your presentation and final
paper. On the assigned date of your presentation, you must
be prepared to lead an informative discussion of your topic.
Although you may use PowerPoint, you are not required to
incorporate any technology. You must also submit a polished thesis statement on that date.
In addition, you must include a citation for a web-based source
that you located on your own. Please paste the URL of your
extra source at the bottom of your thesis statement.
The best way to approach the presentation would be to begin by
reading your thesis statement, then highlight specific themes or
details, then comment on your central conclusion. If you
still have questions about your topic at the time of your
presentation, feel free to ask me and your fellow students.
However, your presentation should be designed to show that you
have already engaged in significant research.
Your final paper must be at least five pages long
(double-spaced; eleven or twelve-point type; one-inch margins).
Please e-mail a polished and complete first draft (formatted in
Word) by Thursday, April 28. If you do not
submit a carefully written draft by 4/28, I will not be able to help
you, and you will probably end up with a significantly lower
grade.
Keep in mind that you will be graded according to your ability
to convey accurate information in college-level prose.
Consequently, if you have writing problems, please visit the
Writing Center to obtain assistance with proofreading and
correcting your paper before you send it in.
If you hope to earn a higher grade than the one you received on
the midterm, regular attendance, active class participation, and
significant improvement of your writing skills are essential.
If you fall short in any of these areas, do not expect to
receive a better grade.
Final Draft of Final Paper Due Via E-mail on Tuesday, May 10.
Formula for thesis statements:
General observation: "Scholars once believed..."
Qualification: "However, recent studies
suggest..."
Statement of strategy: "By examining...this paper will
show..."
1. Ideas of the Founders
General Themes: Strict
Constructionism; Gender
Discrimination, Racial Discrimination; Affirmative Action; Gun
Control; Campaign Finance Reform; Abortion; Racial Profiling;
Torture; Tax Policy; Environmental Policy; Privacy; Regulation
of Banks, Insurance Companies, and Financial Services
Providers; Military Draft; Telecommunications Regulation; Welfare
Policy; Marriage Law
Suggested Topics and Sources: (Specific) Times
Topics:
Affirmative Action (Browse for specific cases.);
Anita
Hill/Clarence Thomas;
District of Columbia v. Heller;
Hillary: The Movie Case;
The Arrest of Henry Louis Gates;
Don't Ask/Don't
Tell;
Debating the Clean Water Act;
Google Timeline:
History of Contraception, 1960-2009; Times Topics:
Death Penalty; Times Topics:
Same-Sex Marriage;
Same-Sex Marriage: Developments in the Law, NOLO;
Gay Rights Controversy, Exploring Constitutional Conflicts;
Same-Sex Marriage:
Recent Developments;
Abortion Law Development: A Brief Overview, Almanac of
Policy Issues;
Supreme Court's Evolving Rulings on Abortion, NPR; Times
Topics:
Abortion
Sample Thesis Statements
In 2009, when the Supreme Court overturned municipal gun-control
laws in District of Columbia v. Heller, supporters applauded the ruling as a restoration of
the constitutional right of the people to keep and bear arms.
In contrast, critics argued that Heller
distorts the intentions of the Framers because it ignores the
Second Amendment stipulation that gun rights pertain to
participation in government militias. By examining both
sides of the debate, this [presentation/paper] will suggest that
Heller was wrongly decided because it obscures the
Framers' view of gun ownership as a collective necessity
rather than as an individual right.
Critics of District of Columbia v. Heller, a 2009
decision in which the Supreme Court overturned gun-control laws
in Washington, D.C., have condemned the ruling as a radical
departure from the long-held legal view that the language
about militias in the Second Amendment defines gun ownership as
a collective rather than individual right. In response,
supporters of Heller have argued that gun-control laws
always violate the Constitution because the Bill of Rights
applies to individuals, not to groups. By examining both
sides of the debate, this [presentation/paper] will
show that the Court rightly decided in Heller, not that gun
control would forever be impermissible, but that gun regulations
cannot be supported if we accept the
Second Amendment as it is presently written.
Sources: District
of Columbia v. Heller; Topics of the Times:
Gun Control; The Federalist Society:
Online Debate about District of Columbia v.
Heller.
Background information for Unit 1
|