|
Context After months of investigation and the questioning of many White House officials and employees, independent council Kenneth Starr forced President Bill Clinton to testify under oath about his relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. The four-hour session was transmitted to the federal courthouse from the White House via closed circuit television. Later that day, Clinton made a televised address to the nation in which he admitted that he had misled the public about his involvement with Lewinsky and apologized for his "critical lapse of judgment" and his "personal failure." However, he stressed that public had no right to intrude any further into his marital or extra-marital affairs, declaring "It's nobody's business but ours. Even presidents have private lives."
|
Tape Four - Questions from Grand Jurors: Q: If Monica Lewinsky has stated that her affidavit that she didn't have a sexual relationship with you is, in fact, a lie, I take it you disagree with that? PRESIDENT CLINTON: No. I told you before what I thought the issue was there, I think the issue is how do you define sexual relationship. And there was no definition imposed on her at the time she executed the affidavit. Therefore, she was free to give it any reasonable meaning. Q: And if she says she was lying – PRESIDENT CLINTON: And I believe – Q: – under your common sense ordinary meaning that you talked about earlier, Mr. President, that most Americans would have, if she says sexual relationship, saying I didn't have one was a lie because I had oral sex with the President, I take it, you would disagree with that? PRESIDENT CLINTON: Now, we're back to where we started and I have to invoke my statement. But, let me just say one thing. I've read a lot, and obviously I don't know whether any of it's accurate, about what she said, and what purports to be on those tapes. And this thing – and I searched my own memory. This reminds me, to some extent, of the hearings when Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill were both testifying under oath. Now, in some rational way, they could not have both been telling the truth, since they had directly different accounts of a shared set of facts. Fortunately, or maybe you think unfortunately, there was no special prosecutor to try to go after one or the other of them, to take sides and try to prove one was a liar. And so, Judge Thomas was able to go on and serve on the Supreme Court What I learned from that, I can tell you that I was a citizen out there just listening. And when I heard both of them testify, what I believed after it was over, I believed that they both thought they were telling the truth. This is – you're dealing with, in some ways, the most mysterious area of human life. I'm doing the best I can to give you honest answers. Q: Mr. President – PRESIDENT CLINTON: And that's all I can say. Q: I'm sorry. PRESIDENT CLINTON: And, you know, those people both testified under oath. So, if there'd been a special prosecutor, they could, one of them could have gone after Anita Hill, another could have gone after Clarence Thomas. I thank God there was no such thing then, because I don't believe that it was a proper thing. Q: One of – PRESIDENT CLINTON: And I think they both thought they were telling the truth. So, maybe Ms. Lewinsky believes she's telling the truth, and I'm glad she got her mother and herself out of trouble. I'm glad you gave her that sweeping immunity. I'm glad for the whole thing. I, I, I – it breaks my heart that she was ever involved in this.
|