Employment Laws (continued)
- court can follow requirement
in Uniform
Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, which require
employer to validate selection procedures that have adverse impact
on protected groups. If selection rate for protected groups is
less than 4/5 of group with highest selection rate, probably
regarded as evidence of adverse impact.
- Permissible discrimination:
There are some permissible discriminatory employment policies:
allowed "if the employer can prove that its employment actions
were related to a bona fide occupational qualification or if
the discriminatory practice was related to a business necessity:
- Bona fide Occupational Qualifications:
"Limited
exceptions to Title VII discrimination laws allowing a company
to hire employees based on their religion, gender, or national
origin where those factors are 'reasonably necessary to the normal
operation of that particular business or enterprise.' The law
does not permit religion-based, gender-based or national origin-based
differences in pay to those holding the same job."
A company must admit that the practices are discriminatory
but argue they are necessary or justified -- otherwise their
business operations would be adversely affected
In the criminal justice system,
there are some permissible discriminatory standards, such as
age, size, weight, vision. These do not apply to racial
discrimination
- Businesss necessity defense
(BND)
applies to situations involving disparate impact. It's less restrictive
than the bona fide defense, applying to all protected
groups, including race. "The key in using the BND is that
the practice is essential to the continued success of the business."
- employers must prove:
- ultimate business goal employer
seeks to achieve through the practice is essential to the business
- the tasks the practice measures
are essential to achieve that business goal
- workers selcted for the positions
in question must be able to perform the tasks
- practice selected is necessary
to measure ability to perform the tasks
- can get very complex: one example
that was judged permissible: requiring English-speaking
workers on oil-drilling operations because of the hazardous nature
of the work.
- Title VII's impact on recruitment
and selection
- can't use advertising practices
that "indicate prohiibited preference, limitation, specification,
or discrimination ...except when these bases are a bona fide
occupational qualifcation for employment" For example, relying
soley on word-of -mouth wouldn't be acceptable, because some
groups would be excluded.
- Selection tools can also be
a problem: you shouldn't use questions that directly inquire
about protected class status, such as race, age, and religious
beliefs.
- questions that may be innocent
or neutral may have a disparate impact on screening out disproproportionate
number of individuals in a porotected class, such as women.
can't
ask about an applicant's arrest record, but can ask if
appllicant has been convicted of a crime or lead guilty or no
contest.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
5 | 6
| 7 | 8
|