- Cell phones
- 1985: St. Petersburg, FL used
cell phones to send incident reports via modem from laptops.
Could "have conversations over the telephone that would
have been impossible over police channels, which require brief,
cryptic messages. They communicated with other officers, supervisors,
detectives, or other agencies, and often talked directly to the
citizens. Patrol officers talked to 911 callers while responding
to crimes in progress to get clarifying information as they approached
the scene. Citizens used them at accident scenes to call family
members, and officers used them at crime scenes to coordinate
the activities of backup officers. The biggest benefit reported
by the officers was that cellular phones saved time. They were
more efficient with less assistance from other officers and dispatchers;
there was less need for dispatchers to relay information or for
other officers to come by, go by or stand by. "(Pilant,
1989).
- Major changes since this report
was written (1998): many more cell phones, plus Wi-Fi, etc.,
but current devices use bandwidth more efficiently.,
Integrating
voice and data transmission, cross-jurisdictional integration
This
was just a vision in 1998 ("With all of this impressive
technology, one of the biggest communications problems still
remains to be solved - that of law enforcement's inability to
communicate across jurisdictions"), now a reality.
- Examples in recent months:
- Internet Protocol (IP) and Packet-switched
communications are critical to this: because they can integrate
a wide range of communications.
- another critical tool will be
roll-out of various XML schema specifically for public safety
and emergency communications, such
as EDXML, because they will allow seamless integration of
data from incompatible legacy data bases.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
5 | 6
| 7 | 8
| 9 | 10
|