(based on Ch 6. of Principles
of Security Management)
 Private
security firms need to improve training
- "contract agencies are
dropping the ball when it comes to providing adequate training
for their men and women,," contends Lawrence
Fennelly, CPO and editor of the third edition of Effective
Physical Security. "On-the-job-training has flaws
and is outdated, plus is unacceptable." (my emphasis)
- old exam and video training
isn't enough
- cost of training is expensive,
but the article speculates that the issue relates to having to
pay better-trained guards more -- "Some security managers
have a hidden agenda and really don't want
people to advance," said Chris Hertig, CPP, CPO, and professor
at York College of Pennsylvania , "Unless they embrace wholeheartedly
the
professional development of their subordinates, protection officers
and the security profession will not achieve professional status."
- Competition has also been a
disincentive for more training, especially for those firms that
provide very minimal services. "Competition has kept costs
down. Some purchasers of security services desire only a warm
body,and expect nothing else, nor will they pay for more.,"
-- Glen Kitteringham, manager of safety and security for Brookfield
Property Management of Calgary,
Alberta.
- HOWEVER, that creates risks
both for the guard and the company, "Security officers are
sometimes expected to react to situations that should only be
handled by well-trained police officers, We recognize the demand
for a high level response, we need to provide training at a higher
level. Additional training protects the individual officer, the
employing agency, the client and the general population. Is there
a reason to not provide a higher level of training other than
because professional" -- Larry Leclair of Miami Dade Community
College.
- "the time spent by security
officers responding to unpredictable loss event occurrences,
calling for a highly skilled police response, will be greatly
minimized.
In most of these cases that response should be transferred to
the public law enforcement officer and not handled by the security
officer."
- "The training bottom line:
An officer will do, under stress, what he or she repeatedly performed
in training. This means training must be as true to life as possible,
or risk ingraining the wrong responses. It is also imperative
that training curriculum be current. But the primary emphasis
of any security officer training must be predicated on prevention,
not response." (my emphasis)
- a sidebar article, "The
Double-danger of On-the-job Training,* emphasized that too many
security officers get much too little training.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
5 | 6
|