Instrumental
Neutron Activation Analysis (INAA): Practice and Potential Forensic
Applications
Eby, N.
and Eby, S.
Instrumental
Neutron Activation Analysis (INAA) is a relatively straightforward
technique for determining elemental abundances in a wide range of
materials. The method utilizes the interaction between a thermal (or
higher energy) neutron and a nucleus to produce a radioactive nuclide
that emits characteristic gamma rays. The energy of the emitted gamma
rays is used to identify the nuclide and the intensity of the radiation
can be used to determine abundance. Solid state detectors are used to
sense the emitted gamma rays, and after suitable corrections and
comparisons with standards, an elemental concentration is determined.
The advantages of INAA are (1) it is a relatively cheap analytical
method, a state-of-the-art facility can be acquired for significantly
less than $100,000 compared to the much higher costs of competing
analytical methods; (2) the method is non-destructive hence the same
sample can be used for other measurements; (3) sample size can be very
small, often as little as a milligram; (4) detection limits for many
elements are in the nanogram range; (5) no chemical preparation is
required, samples are analyzed as is; and (6) on the order of 40
elements can be measured essentially simultaneously. The major
disadvantage of INAA is that there are elements that may be of interest
in the periodic table that cannot be analyzed by INAA. For this reason
INAA laboratories often partner with laboratories that do X-ray
fluorescence (XRF) analysis, which is a complementary technique to INAA.
The combined methods can produce high quality data for about 60 elements
in the periodic table. The elements that can routinely be determined by
INAA, and their detection limits, are listed in Table 1.
Table
1. Detection limits (DL) for elements that can be determined by
INAA
|
DL
(nanograms)
|
Elements
|
0.01-0.1
|
Au,
Eu, Ho, Ir, Sm, Lu
|
0.1-1
|
Ag,
As, Co, Cs, Hf, La, Sb, Sc, Se, Ta, Tb, Th, Tm, U, W, Yb
|
1-10
|
Ba,
Br, Ce, Cr, Gd, Mo, Na, Nd, Ni, Rb, Sr, Zn, Zr
|
10-100
|
K
|
100-1000
|
Fe
|
There are numerous potential applications for INAA in forensic
investigations. Here we give two examples – determining the source of
maple syrup and identifying the region of origin of grass samples.
1)
Maple syrup –
during the production of maple syrup there are several opportunities for
the introduction of characteristic elemental signatures – initial
elemental signatures in the sap due to differences in the underlying
soil chemistry, trace elements introduced during the tapping of the tree
and transport to the sugar house, and trace elements introduced during
the boiling down of the sap to produce maple syrup. In Table 2 we list
selected elements and elemental ratios for maple syrup from various
sources that allow us to distinguish between these different sources.
Table
2. Elemental characteristic of maple syrup. Numbers in bold are
characteristic of the particular sample.
|
|
Quebec
|
Newton
|
Winsor
|
Parker
|
Gale
|
Sc
|
0.030
|
0.010
|
0.009
|
0.004
|
0.006
|
Cr
|
1.67
|
0.67
|
0.71
|
0.83
|
0.87
|
Co
|
0.119
|
0.094
|
0.064
|
0.073
|
0.057
|
Zn
|
19.4
|
9.3
|
13.1
|
50.6
|
76.3
|
Rb
|
9.0
|
7.5
|
3.1
|
10.2
|
15.7
|
Sr
|
17.5
|
28.6
|
13.7
|
10.7
|
8.3
|
As
|
0.016
|
0.029
|
0.014
|
0.022
|
0.010
|
Sb
|
0.009
|
0.018
|
0.010
|
0.034
|
0.010
|
Se
|
8.72
|
ppb
|
|
|
|
Zn/Cr
|
11.6
|
13.9
|
18.5
|
61
|
88
|
Rb/Cs
|
419
|
642
|
363
|
433
|
175
|
Ba/Sr
|
0.37
|
0.59
|
0.18
|
0.76
|
1.29
|
As/Sb
|
1.91
|
1.59
|
1.50
|
0.64
|
2.24
|
2)
Serengeti grasses
– grass samples were collected from a variety of locations in a
several hundred square kilometer area of Serengeti National Park,
Tanzania. The major genera are Digitaria,
Pennisetum, Sparobolus, and Themeda.
The samples were analyzed for a number of trace elements by INAA. Many
elements were determined in the ppb to 10s of ppm range. Grass samples
collected from different areas show different abundances and abundance
ratios for a number of the trace elements. These variations are in part
due to variations in the chemistry of the underlying soils. Hence, trace
element abundances can be used to identify the geographic location of a
grass sample. It should be noted that 50 years ago mineral exploration
geologists used the chemistry of plant materials to explore for ore
deposits. Elevated abundances of the elements of interest in the plant
material suggested a possible exploration area. Ecologists have also
shown for the more common elements that there is a relationship between
soil chemistry and plant chemistry. Hence the relationship between soil
chemistry and the chemistry of plant material is well established and
can be used to differentiate between grass samples collected from
different areas.
Electronic
version
Nature
Blog - Geological Society of London Forensic Geology Meeting 2008
Back
to publications.
Instrumental
Neutron Activation Analysis (INAA) - Practice and Application
Eby,
G. N.
Instrumental
Neutron Activation Analysis (INAA) is a relatively straightforward
technique for determining elemental abundances in a wide range of
materials. The method utilizes the interaction between a thermal (or
higher energy) neutron and a nucleus to produce a radioactive nuclide
that emits characteristic gamma rays. Solid state detectors are used to
sense the emitted gamma rays, and after suitable corrections and
comparisons with standards, an absolute elemental concentration is
determined.
The advantages of INAA are (1) it is a relatively cheap analytical
method, a state-of-the-art facility can be acquired for significantly
less than $100,000 compared to the much higher costs of competing
analytical methods; (2) the method is non-destructive hence the same
sample can be used for other measurements; (3) sample size can be very
small, often as little as a milligram; (4) detection limits for many
elements are in the nanogram range; (5) no chemical preparation is
required, samples are analyzed as is; and (6) about 40 elements can be
measured essentially simultaneously. The major disadvantage of INAA is
that there are a number of elements of interest in the periodic table
that cannot be analyzed by INAA. For this reason INAA laboratories often
partner with laboratories that do X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis,
which is a complementary technique to INAA. The combined methods can
produce high quality data for about 60 elements in the periodic table.
For a wide range of analytical problems the major competing method is
Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICPMS). This method
involves significant sample preparation steps, which depending on the
material can be very problematic, and high entry costs (on the order of
$500,000 to $1,000,000). However, ICPMS can be used to determine
elemental abundances for most of the elements in the periodic table,
which is its major advantage.
Some examples of application of INAA (and when needed XRF) are (1)
trace element analyses of minerals and rocks; (2) partitioning of metals
between phases in coal; (3) origin of archaeological artifacts; (4)
metals in hair, nails, etc.; (5) chemistry of atmospheric aerosols; (6)
metals in tree rings as a proxy for environmental pollution; (7)
chemistry of Serengeti grasses as a factor in animal behavior; (8)
correlation of tephra (ash) layers for archaeological projects; and (9)
characterization of trace constituents in nanotech materials.
Electronic
version
Back
to publications.
|