home
page > Unit 12: summing up /
study guide
How does the shift to a learning organization
play out in terms of the management functions we have studied?
Training:
- Problems:
- Private security firms need to improve
training
- "contract agencies are
dropping the ball when it comes to providing adequate training
for their men and women,," contends Lawrence
Fennelly, CPO and editor of the third edition of Effective
Physical Security. "On-the-job-training has flaws
and is outdated, plus is unacceptable." (my emphasis)
- old exam and video training
isn't enough
- cost of training is expensive,
but the article speculates that the issue relates to having to
pay better-trained guards more -- "Some security managers
have a hidden agenda and really don't want people to advance,"
said Chris Hertig, CPP, CPO, and professor at York College of
Pennsylvania , "Unless they embrace wholeheartedly the professional
development of their subordinates, protection officers and the
security profession will not achieve professional status."
- Competition has also been a
disincentive for more training, especially for those firms that
provide very minimal services. "Competition has kept costs
down. Some purchasers of security services desire only a warm
body,and expect nothing else, nor will they pay for more.,"
-- Glen Kitteringham, manager of safety and security for Brookfield
Property Management of Calgary, Alberta.
- HOWEVER, that creates risks
both for the guard and the company, "Security officers are
sometimes expected to react to situations that should only be
handled by well-trained police officers, We recognize the demand
for a high level response, we need to provide training at a higher
level. Additional training protects the individual officer, the
employing agency, the client and the general population. Is there
a reason to not provide a higher level of training other than
because professional" -- Larry Leclair of Miami Dade Community
College.
- "the time spent by security
officers responding to unpredictable loss event occurrences,
calling for a highly skilled police response, will be greatly
minimized. In most of these cases that response should be transferred
to the public law enforcement officer and not handled by the
security officer."
- "The training bottom line:
An officer will do, under stress, what he or she repeatedly performed
in training. This means training must be as true to life as possible,
or risk ingraining the wrong responses. It is also imperative
that training curriculum be current. But the primary emphasis
of any security officer training must be predicated on prevention,
not response." (my emphasis)
- a sidebar article, "The
Double-danger of On-the-job Training,* emphasized that too many
security officers get much too little training.
- Current state of training has
been a long-term concern:
- Private Security Task Force/National
Advisory Committee on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals (1977)
called for:
- certification programs
- at least 8 hrs. of pre-assignment
& 32 hrs. of basic training (16 of which could be in service
- training in firearms where applicable
- training of supervisors and
managers
- on-going training
- involvement of appropriate state
agencies to coordinate and approve curricula, certification of
instructors and accreditation of training schools.
- report didn't result in federal
legislation, but did help security-related organizations compare
their existing training levels to the recommendations.
- Hallcreast Report I (Private
Security & Police in America, 1985) and Hallcreast Report
II 1990):
- determined clients have few
methods to verify training of contractual guards, even in those
state with mandated training.
- "..misrepresentation
of the level of training given to contract security guards was
a frequently reported complaint from clients and competing guard
firms. On-the-job training was often the only type of training
that a security officer received." (my emphasis)
1 | 2 | 3 | 4
| 5 | 6
| 7 | 8
| 9 | 10
|