44.312 Security Management

home page > Unit 4: Planning & decision making

Management's Role in Effective Decision Making (continued)

  • Support for risk taking:
    Need to create a climate that encourages risk taking.
    • one way is "modeling" risk-taking behavior -- both demonstrating the behavior and showing they accept failure as the price of taking risk.
    • must also emphasize the positive aspects of risk taking: get employees to share concerns about risk, and to take steps that improve employees' self-confidence, attitudes, and self-esteems.
    • show that employees won't be punished or abandoned if they fail. Especially true for younger workers, who are likely to fail more often due to lack of experience.
    • managers can't ignore mistakes, but must lead a process that will learn from them.
    • Can also increase level of risk taking by the risk's "terminal value": "the value that survives a project to benefit other .. projects" (Case and Shane, 1998). Because of these values, organization is more likely to take on a risky project, because there will still be benefit even if it fails to achieve primary goal.Those values could include:
      • what the organization learned from project
      • changes in interdepartmental relationship
      • building employees' competence
  • Managerial attitudes and decision success
    • Harrison and Pelletier (1995) model for decision success argues that decision success is a function of managerial attitudes: if the measure of success is unreasonable, there's no chance of attaining it, and people won't buy in.
    • need to also have an open process, so that stakeholders are constantly considered and consulted, in order to get their buy-in
    • "Managers should not take a judgmental approach to the success of the decisions, based on the fact that all decisions have a degree of uncertainty." That means that all decisions may be imperfect and that's a reality.
    • Seek satisfactory outcomes, and evaluate in terms of whether they met decisions' objectives realistically (taking into account the fact that decisions are made without 100% knowledge in advance).
  • Shared vision:
    • if employees don't understand the vision, they can't make effective decisions.
    • Vision statement is not same as a mission statement:
      • mission statement: what the organization does, and focuses on services, key customers, products
      • vision statement: provides structure and direction for decision makers. Without it, there's lack of direction, apathy.
      • Factors to consider (Brown, 1998):
        • must give employees a picture of where company wants to be
        • be brief, so it can be easily recalled
        • verifiable: so individuals can agree whether or not it has been met
        • focused on, at most, 1-2 elements of company or major goals
        • purpose is to communicate company's direction, so all employees must understand it
  • inspirational: to motivate employees

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10