Management's
Role in Effective Decision Making (continued)
Support
for risk taking:
Need to create a
climate that encourages risk taking.
- one way is "modeling"
risk-taking behavior -- both demonstrating the behavior and showing
they accept failure as the price of taking risk.
- must also emphasize the positive
aspects of risk taking: get employees to share concerns about
risk, and to take steps that improve employees' self-confidence,
attitudes, and self-esteems.
- show that employees won't be
punished or abandoned if they fail. Especially true for younger
workers, who are likely to fail more often due to lack of experience.
- managers can't ignore mistakes,
but must lead a process that will learn from them.
- Can also increase level of risk
taking by the risk's "terminal
value": "the value that survives a project to benefit
other .. projects" (Case and Shane, 1998). Because of these
values, organization is more likely to take on a risky project,
because there will still be benefit even if it fails to achieve
primary goal.Those values could include:
- what the organization learned
from project
- changes in interdepartmental
relationship
- building employees' competence
- Managerial attitudes and
decision success
- Harrison and Pelletier (1995)
model for decision success argues that decision success is a
function of managerial attitudes: if the measure of success is
unreasonable, there's no chance of attaining it, and people won't
buy in.
- need to also have an open process,
so that stakeholders are constantly considered and consulted,
in order to get their buy-in
- "Managers should not take
a judgmental approach to the success of the decisions, based
on the fact that all decisions have a degree of uncertainty."
That means that all decisions may be imperfect and that's a reality.
- Seek satisfactory outcomes,
and evaluate in terms of whether they met decisions' objectives
realistically (taking into account the fact that decisions are
made without 100% knowledge in advance).
Shared
vision:
- if employees don't understand
the vision, they can't make effective decisions.
- Vision statement is not same
as a mission statement:
- mission statement: what the
organization does, and focuses on services, key customers, products
- vision statement: provides structure
and direction for decision makers. Without it, there's lack of
direction, apathy.
- Factors to consider (Brown,
1998):
- must give employees a picture
of where company wants to be
- be brief, so it can be easily
recalled
- verifiable: so individuals can
agree whether or not it has been met
- focused on, at most, 1-2 elements
of company or major goals
- purpose is to communicate company's
direction, so all employees must understand it
- inspirational: to motivate employees
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
5 | 6
| 7 | 8
| 9 | 10
|